In the video, Rebecca Saxe mistakenly attributed the following quote to Alan Greenspan when it was actually said by Robert McCloskey:
I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realise that what you heard is not what I meant.
Moral thinking is critical in many legal systems. In fact, the insanity defense depends on demonstrating that the defendant is incapable of moral thinking (temporarily or permanently). I imagine this research has far-reaching consequences.
Suppose you know that someone has a deficient rTPJ; how does that alter your perception of their judgments?